The Digital Agora and the Asian Church: A Nuanced Analysis of the FABC-OSC Bishops' Meet 2025 on Artificial Intelligence and Pastoral Resilience

I. Executive Summary: Convictions, Cautions, and Commitments

1.1 Overview of the FABC Mandate and Context

The Federation of Asian Bishops' Conferences (FABC), through its Office of Social Communications (FABC-OSC), convened the Bishops' Meet 2025 in Hong Kong from December 10–12 at Saint Francis University.¹ This gathering marked a pivotal moment for the Church in Asia, focusing on the highly complex theme: "Artificial Intelligence and Pastoral Challenges in Asia".¹ Bringing together over 30 delegates, including bishops, theologians, and communication specialists from across the continent, the assembly was structured as a regional discernment aimed at charting a responsible course for digital ministry.¹

At the conclusion of the three-day dialogue, participants released a formal statement summarizing their collective reflections, concerns, and strategic commitments.⁵ This document, described as the result of "prayer, discernment, and dialogue," presents a comprehensive framework that embraces the technological momentum of AI while demanding stringent ethical and pastoral guardrails.⁵ The overarching conviction is that, through responsible innovation and collaboration, AI can strengthen the Church's mission and promote integral human and spiritual growth.⁵

1.2 The Theological Balancing Act

The core philosophical approach adopted by the FABC rejects both technological determinism and fearful withdrawal. Instead, Church leaders asserted that AI should be regarded as a potential tool for mission, describing it as a "gift from God" that must be used for the good of humanity and the care of the common home.⁴ This theological permission structure allows for active engagement with emerging technologies, requiring that technological advances be grounded in ethical discernment, human dignity, and the mission of the Church.²

However, this optimism is profoundly tempered by pastoral caution. The consensus view, strongly articulated by Vatican officials present, is that true wisdom and morality cannot originate from machines and algorithms.⁷ An excessive reliance on machines poses significant risks: it can weaken essential human relationships, diminish prayer and reflection, and reduce the irreplaceable presence of teachers, pastors, and parents.⁵ The analysis underscores that the ethical risks associated with AI stem primarily from its owners, programmers, and users, not the technology itself, demanding that human responsibility remains paramount.⁷

1.3 Key Strategic Commitments

The primary output of the FABC-OSC Bishops' Meet is a set of actionable recommendations intended to ensure institutional readiness and safeguard the integrity of human life in the digital age. These strategic commitments focus on internal formation and external advocacy.⁹ Internally, the Church in Asia is called to integrate AI literacy with pastoral, ethical, and relational formation in seminaries, dioceses, schools, and families. This systemic educational effort aims to unite digital competence with lived spiritual wisdom.⁹ Externally, the FABC committed to fostering regional collaboration among national communication offices and engaging actively in public policy discussions, thereby crafting contextual guidelines and advocating for the principles of human dignity and the common good in AI governance.⁹

II. Contextualizing the FABC AI Summit: A Regional Mandate and Theological Framing

2.1 The Convening Authority and Representation

The Bishops' Meet 2025, organized by the Office of Social Communications of the Federations of Asian Bishops' Conferences (FABC-OSC), served as a high-level strategic policy summit for the region.¹ The meeting's scope and composition underscored the universal importance of its deliberations. Over 30 delegates participated, representing a wide range of ecclesial and communication expertise from across Asia.¹

Specific episcopal representatives from Vietnam, Japan, Sri Lanka, Taiwan, Thailand, and Indonesia were present, alongside the chairperson of FABC-OSC, Bishop Marcelino Antonio M. Maralit Jr..¹ The seriousness placed upon responsible AI engagement within the universal Church was reinforced by the presence of senior officials from the Vatican's Dicastery for Communication, including Dr. Paolo Ruffini, Prefect, and Dr. Nataša Govekar, Theological-Pastoral Director.¹ This collaboration between the FABC and the Vatican hierarchy indicates the event was designed not merely for discussion, but for developing cohesive regional guidance. The wide geographical representation was essential for crafting policy that acknowledged the vast cultural, political, and economic variations—and corresponding digital divides—prevalent across the Asian continent.

2.2 Theological Framing: AI as a Gift Requiring Discernment

The tone for the meeting was decisively set by Cardinal Stephen Chow, S.J., of Hong Kong, who presided at the opening Mass. He invited delegates to approach the conversations with openness, prudence, and a missionary spirit.¹ Cardinal Chow provided the essential theological permission structure for engagement, assuring the Church that AI is "not from the devil. AI comes from God, who helps us".⁴ He urged the Church to embrace AI responsibly, viewing it as a tool that, if guided by faith and conscience, can achieve the blessings God intends for humanity.⁴

This assertion that AI is a "gift from God" transforms the strategic response from one of passive avoidance to active stewardship and responsible innovation. By rooting the study of AI in the Catholic mandate for scientific advancement and missionary adaptation, the Cardinal prevented the adoption of a purely reactive or technology-averse stance.⁶ This framing necessitated that the resulting guidelines focus rigorously on how to use this gift responsibly, demanding deep discernment to separate the tool's inherent capacity for good from the misuse by human creators or users.⁷

2.3 Defining the Limits of Artificiality (The Vatican Perspective)

While embracing the potential benefits of AI, the FABC meeting strongly reinforced the theological boundaries regarding its ontological status. Dr. Paolo Ruffini, Prefect of the Dicastery for Communication, delivered a clear caution, stressing that AI must never be permitted to replace human wisdom or diminish the dignity that lies at the heart of Christian life.⁷ He insisted that "intelligence itself 'cannot be artificial'".⁷

Ruffini provided a crucial philosophical distinction: he described current AI systems not as genuine intelligence, but rather as "calculation" or a "statistical gamble," which often conceals errors or the self-interest of their creators behind a façade of neutrality.⁷ This ontological critique prevents the assignment of moral agency or spiritual authority to AI systems. When technology is reduced to a product of human intelligence¹¹, its ethical limitations become apparent: "true wisdom cannot come from machines and algorithms".⁷ The ultimate danger, Ruffini warned, is the human temptation to believe that AI can offer omniscience or total knowledge, which is structurally equivalent to the temptation of the original sin, "to be like God".⁷ This analysis established a critical policy boundary: the ethical risks reside exclusively with human actors—"those who own them, those who programme them and those who use them"⁷—thereby placing the responsibility for ethical governance squarely upon human conscience and established moral principles.

III. AI Ethics: Grounding the Asian Response in Universal Catholic Teaching

The FABC discussions were firmly anchored in the broader ethical corpus of the Catholic Church, integrating the regional perspective with universal principles established by Vatican guidelines and international agreements like the Rome Call for AI Ethics.

3.1 The Foundational Principles of Catholic Social Thought

The central tenet guiding the Church's reflection on AI is the inviolable nature of human dignity—the cornerstone of Catholic social thought.¹² AI must serve humanity, not the reverse, respecting the unique and irreplaceable dignity of every individual and promoting the Common Good.¹² This commitment mandates that technological systems refrain from use cases that exploit, manipulate, or exclude, particularly those that perpetuate biases or degrade human autonomy.¹³ The Church's ethical approach, which grounds these prohibitions in theological principles, offers an objective standard that reinforces ethical policies, ensuring that the protection of human dignity is non-negotiable across all technological implementations.¹³

3.2 Operationalizing Ethics: Alignment with the Rome Call for AI Ethics

The FABC's approach aligns with the international framework set by the Rome Call for AI Ethics, which outlines specific requirements for ethical technology development.¹⁵ This commitment demonstrates the Asian Church's intent to engage AI developers and policymakers structurally. The Rome Call commits signatories to an "algorethics" focused on serving every person and humanity as a whole, ensuring that technological advance does not prioritize greater profit or the replacement of people in the workplace.¹⁵

The guidelines mandate six core ethical principles essential for responsible innovation¹⁶:

1. Transparency: AI systems must be understandable to all users.
2. Inclusion: Systems must not discriminate against anyone, affirming that every human being possesses equal dignity.
3. Responsibility: There must always be a discernible human actor who takes responsibility for the actions and outputs of a machine.
4. Impartiality: AI systems must not follow or create biases.
5. Reliability: AI systems must be capable of working reliably and consistently.
6. Security and Privacy: Systems must operate securely and respect the privacy of users.¹⁶

The strong emphasis on Impartiality and Inclusion is particularly critical in the diverse and economically varied Asian context, directly addressing the regional reality where algorithmic bias risks perpetuating discrimination against vulnerable populations and minority groups.¹²

3.3 The Comprehensive Scope of Antiqua et Nova Warnings

The deliberations of the Asian bishops were further informed by the extensive detail provided in the Vatican document Antiqua et Nova (a Note on the relationship between artificial intelligence and human intelligence). This document highlights specific challenges and ethical violations that require proactive pastoral and policy responses.¹¹

The note covers the potential risks of AI across several societal domains:

• Warfare and Existential Risk: The document warns severely of AI's potential to increase "the instruments of war well beyond the scope of human oversight"¹¹, precipitating a destabilizing arms race.¹¹ It supports Pope Francis's urgent call for the ban of lethal autonomous weapons systems, noting that their potential to act in ways that threaten the survival of regions or humanity itself poses an "'existential risk'".¹¹
• Relationships and Deception: Antiqua et Nova cautions that AI can lead to "harmful isolation".¹¹ It specifies that misrepresenting an AI system as a person, especially for fraudulent purposes, constitutes a "grave ethical violation".¹¹ Moreover, using AI to deceive in contexts such as education or human relationships—including the sphere of sexuality—is explicitly deemed immoral and requires careful oversight.¹¹ This concern regarding deception provides the technical justification for the FABC's focus on safeguarding the integrity of formative spaces and protecting minors.
• Economy and Labor: The document notes that while AI promises productivity boosts, current implementations risk paradoxical outcomes: deskilling workers, subjecting them to automated surveillance, and relegating them to rigid and repetitive tasks.¹¹ This requires the Asian Church to address the full spectrum of socio-economic disruption in rapidly industrializing nations, advocating for solutions that protect workers' dignity amid automation.¹²
• Discrimination and Healthcare: AI systems risk reinforcing existing disparities. The potential replacement of the essential doctor-patient relationship can worsen the loneliness accompanying illness and amplify disparities in access to care, potentially creating a "'medicine for the rich' model".¹¹
• Environmental Impact: Integrating AI policy with the Church's social teaching (Laudato Si') is critical. Antiqua et Nova highlights that current AI models and the required hardware consume vast amounts of energy and water, significantly contributing to CO2 emissions and straining resources, despite potential beneficial applications for environmental monitoring.¹¹ This mandates that FABC guidelines consider criteria for energy efficiency and resource consumption in any recommended AI system.

The detailed warnings in Antiqua et Nova serve as a technical blueprint for the ethical policies that must be implemented regionally.

IV. Analysis of Pastoral and Societal Challenges in the Asian Context

The FABC-OSC meeting recognized that the integration of AI presents specific consequences in the unique cultural, economic, and relational landscape of Asia, demanding targeted pastoral strategies.

4.1 Erosion of Relationality and the Integrity of Ministry

A primary pastoral concern raised by the Asian bishops is the threat AI poses to the relational core of Christian life and ministry.⁵ The statement cautioned that excessive reliance on machines risks diminishing the "irreplaceable presence of teachers, pastors, and parents".⁵ This reduction is viewed not merely as a practical setback, but as an ontological threat to the vocation of ministry. The Church's value proposition in ministry is fundamentally based on human presence, compassion, and wisdom, elements that Vatican officials confirmed AI cannot replicate.⁷

Should the Church utilize AI tools in ways that functionally replace pastoral care, it risks inadvertently devaluing the human vocation and tacitly affirming the AI model's supremacy in the spiritual domain. The focus on preserving the "irreplaceable presence" of human guides serves as a necessary protective boundary for the ministerial identity, emphasizing that AI must serve as a complement to, not a substitute for, genuine human interaction.⁵ Furthermore, the replacement of key human relationships, such as the doctor-patient bond, risks worsening the inherent loneliness that often accompanies illness, a risk heightened by AI-driven healthcare systems.¹¹

4.2 The Crisis of Truth, Trust, and the Integrity of Catholic Media

The rapid evolution of AI has fundamentally challenged trust in communication and the concept of objective truth. Cardinal Chow articulated this crisis by referencing the Cantonese Chinese proverb, 「有圖有真相」, meaning "real fact is revealed in the photo".¹ He observed that, in the age of deepfakes and manipulated content, this confidence is shattered, making the task of revealing truth behind "so-called facts" increasingly challenging.¹ The proliferation of AI-generated content poses a serious risk of generating manipulated content and false information, which is exponentially worse when spread with the intent to deceive or cause harm.¹¹

In response to this epistemological shift, Church leaders mandated an internal ethical strategy for communicators. Cardinal Chow stressed that Catholic media must uphold sound ethical standards and professionalism according to the Gospel spirit.¹ The priority must be to honor God first, rather than the agenda of funding agents or external ideologies.⁴ This structural critique addresses the way AI platforms often monetize and amplify divisive or misleading content, demanding that Catholic agencies maintain ethical purity against powerful commercial or political pressures.¹ Participants in the Hong Kong gathering also noted particular unease about AI-generated religious content that may distort doctrine, manipulate sacred realities, or create "fake intimacy" with artificial personas.⁹ This necessitates that producers and sharers of AI-generated content exercise diligence in verifying truth and avoiding the dissemination of materials that degrade human beings or exploit the vulnerable.¹¹

4.3 Systemic Bias, Inequality, and the Digital Divide in Asia

AI deployment presents immediate and acute justice concerns in Asia due to existing vast social and economic disparities. The FABC recognized that AI development risks aggravating poverty, social inequalities, and the "digital divide".¹¹ Algorithmic bias can reduce people to mere data points, contradicting their fundamental dignity, and can perpetuate discrimination against Asia's most vulnerable populations.¹²

A particularly distinct Asian challenge identified in the reflection is the potential for AI to weaken authentic interfaith dialogue.⁹ This risk arises because AI-driven information silos, or targeted misinformation campaigns, could damage the sensitive social and religious fabric of multi-religious Asian societies. This demands high vigilance from the FABC-OSC and national communication offices.

The strategic determination here is that AI is not merely a technological challenge but a fundamental justice issue. Since discriminatory algorithms directly violate the principle of Inclusion¹⁶, and given the context of rapid technological adoption alongside massive wealth disparity, the FABC concluded that a clear mandate for advocacy and public policy engagement is necessary to address the marginalization of the poor and excluded.⁹

V. Theological Innovation: The Kapwa Model for Digital Ministry

In seeking contextual theological models to answer the challenges of AI, the FABC discussions highlighted the profound relevance of indigenous Asian concepts, finding expression in the Filipino concept of Kapwa.

5.1 Shared Personhood as an Ecclesiological Anchor

The meeting's reflection coincided with the publication of the theological work Cyberchurch – Neighborhood of Other/s (Kapwa), which proposes an ecclesiological model grounded in kapwa, defined as "shared personhood and relational solidarity".¹⁷ This concept provides a vital framework for understanding how faith communities can genuinely embody the Christian mission within online spaces.¹⁷

The theological significance of Kapwa lies in its capacity to serve as a counter-narrative to the technological risks identified by the Church. It is the theological antidote to the "harmful isolation"¹¹ and relational erosion noted by the FABC.⁵ By centering shared humanity, the model mandates that digital interactions must foster genuine mutuality and shared identity, actively resisting the reduction of individuals to exploitable data points.¹² This approach ensures that the digital sphere remains focused on persons, not calculations.

5.2 Legitimizing the Digital Agora as Ecclesial Presence

The Kapwa model offers a critical theological function: evaluating whether online communities, whether connected to traditional parish structures or operating entirely digitally, can be recognized as genuine, authentic forms of ecclesial presence, rather than temporary or functional substitutes for physical worship.¹⁷

The authors draw theological validation from scriptural foundations, citing passages such as Matthew 18:20, where the presence of Christ is affirmed: "where two or three gather in my name, there am I with them".¹⁷ By applying this principle to digital gatherings, the FABC implicitly encourages priests and lay communicators to transition from passive digital observation to serious, sustained investment in digital ministry.¹⁷ This theological validation allows the Church to move beyond simple tool usage into a phase of active, incarnational presence in cyberspace, utilizing the digital environment as a true extension of its evangelical mission.

5.3 Justice and Compassion on the Digital Highway

The Kapwa model further provides an ethical framework for digital interaction by reinterpreting the Parable of the Good Samaritan. It views the digital realm as a contemporary "highway" where believers are called to practice compassion, justice, and neighborliness toward those they encounter online.¹⁷

However, the authors prudently caution that any ecclesiology of cyberspace, even one grounded in relational concepts like Kapwa, must remain acutely attentive to issues of social inequality.¹⁷ The persistence of the digital divide—which excludes populations lacking internet access, technological resources, or digital literacy—means that the Church must ensure its digital ministry does not further marginalize the poor or vulnerable.¹⁷ The synthesis of relational theology (the Kapwa mandate) with a clear ethical obligation (the Good Samaritan parable) ensures that technological enthusiasm does not override the fundamental Christian duty to the excluded in Asia.

VI. Strategic Commitments and Guidelines for Action (The Path Forward)

The FABC-OSC Bishops' Meet 2025 resulted in concrete, actionable strategies intended to implement the ethical and pastoral vision across the continent, focusing on internal capacity building and external policy advocacy.

6.1 Integrating AI Literacy and Formation

The FABC concluded that prioritizing education and media literacy is an essential safeguard for human freedom in the face of rapid technological change.¹⁹ The key strategic commitment is the integration of AI literacy with ethical, pastoral, and relational formation.⁹

This strategic education is targeted at all levels of the Church structure: seminaries, dioceses, schools, and families.⁹ By equipping future clergy and parents with the tools for digital discernment, the Church aims for generational change. The stated goal is to unite digital competence with "lived wisdom"⁹, ensuring that technological skills are constantly moderated by ethical judgment and spiritual maturity. This comprehensive formation is viewed as the most robust defense against the spread of misinformation and the erosion of relational truth.¹⁹

6.2 Institutional Governance and Accountability

To manage the deployment of AI responsibly, the FABC emphasized the need for clear institutional governance. The commitment calls for digital evangelization to be rigorously marked by human oversight and pastoral accountability.⁹ Furthermore, dioceses and episcopal conferences across Asia are encouraged to establish dedicated bodies to study AI's localized impact and to craft contextual guidelines.⁹

This directive respects the principle of subsidiarity. While the FABC provides the universal theological and ethical framework, localized episcopal conferences must adapt the implementation strategies to account for specific national legal systems, political climates, and cultural nuances.⁹ This ensures that AI policy is enforceable and relevant, establishing clear lines of responsibility for technological outcomes, consistent with the Rome Call principle of Responsibility.¹⁶

6.3 Digital Evangelization and Mission-Oriented Innovation

The Asian Church acknowledges AI's practical utility as a functional tool. The technology can support tasks such as research, translation, summarizing, and specifically, scripture searches.⁶ The FABC encourages young people to engage actively in mission-oriented digital innovation, provided it is guided by Christian compassion and hope.⁹ The challenge is to utilize AI's functional capacity effectively while ensuring that these tools remain firmly subordinate to human wisdom and defined pastoral goals. Experts present at the meeting offered guidance on principles for using AI in evangelization and pastoral care, emphasizing responsible, people-centered approaches.³ This careful approach prevents the pitfall of using technology merely for novelty and firmly anchors innovation in the primary mission of evangelization.⁷

6.4 Fostering Regional Coordination and Public Policy Engagement

Recognizing that many AI challenges transcend national boundaries, the FABC committed to fostering regional collaboration, especially through national communication offices.⁹ This coordination is essential for sharing effective mitigation strategies against pan-Asian risks such as deepfakes, algorithmic bias, and manipulated religious content.

Crucially, the FABC also committed to active engagement in public policy concerning AI development.⁹ This marks a shift toward systemic advocacy, moving beyond individual behavior modification to address structural risks. The policy engagement is necessary to confront the macro-risks detailed in Antiqua et Nova, such as advocating against the use of lethal autonomous weapons systems and challenging data exploitation and the concentration of corporate power over mainstream AI applications.¹¹ The goal is to ensure that AI development serves humanity and the common good, not just the interests of a privileged few.¹⁵

VII. Conclusion: Charting the Mission in a Shifting Digital Context

The FABC-OSC Bishops' Meet 2025 delivered a comprehensive framework for the Asian Church's engagement with artificial intelligence, successfully synthesizing universal ethical imperatives with contextual pastoral needs. The vision articulated is one of confidence tempered by humility—confidence that AI is a "gift from God" with immense capacity to strengthen the Church's mission, and humility in recognizing that "intelligence cannot be artificial," confining AI to its role as a tool rather than a source of wisdom or moral guidance.⁴

The strategic synthesis achieved by the FABC involves two necessary movements. First, an inward focus on formation, mandating that the Church build institutional resilience through AI literacy and ethical training in its formative structures.⁹ This is essential to prevent the erosion of human relationships and the diminishing of spiritual life threatened by over-reliance on machines.⁵ Second, an outward focus on justice, requiring the Church to actively engage in public policy and advocacy to combat the systemic risks of algorithmic bias, digital divide, and the potential misuse of AI in warfare.⁹

The ultimate goal remains the protection of integral human growth and dignity. The Church's enduring task, emphasized throughout the meeting, is to ensure persistent, courageous discernment, remaining grounded in conscience and faith as rapid social changes occur.⁴ By positioning AI only as a tool to complement human intelligence and relational ministry, and never to replace its richness, the Asian Church seeks to prevent humanity from becoming "enslaved to its own work"¹¹, thereby securing the integrity of the human person in the digital age.

Works Cited

1. 1. Sound ethical standards and professionalism needed Cardinal Stephen says at opening Mass of the FABC meeting on pastoral challenge of AI | Asia | Sunday Examiner | 10 December 2025, accessed December 14, 2025, https://www.examiner.org.hk/2025/12/10/cardinal-stephens-homily-at-the-opening-mass-of-the-fabc-meeting-on-pastoral-challenge-of-ai/news/hongkong/
2. 2. Hong Kong: Asian Church leaders gather to discern AI's pastoral impact - Catholic Sabah, accessed December 14, 2025, https://www.catholicsabah.com/hong-kong-asian-church-leaders-gather-to-discern-ais-pastoral-impact/
3. 3. FABC Office of Social Communications Organizes Bishops' Meet in Hong Kong to Discern AI's Pastoral Impact - Radio Veritas Asia, accessed December 14, 2025, https://www.rvasia.org/asian-news/fabc-office-social-communications-organizes-bishops-meet-hong-kong-discern-ais-pastoral
4. 4. Cardinal Chow to Asian Bishops and Communicators: "AI is here to Stay" | RVA, accessed December 14, 2025, https://www.rvasia.org/asian-news/cardinal-chow-asian-bishops-and-communicators-ai-here-stay
5. 5. Asian bishops call for responsible and pastoral engagement with ..., accessed December 14, 2025, https://www.examiner.org.hk/2025/12/13/asian-bishops-call-for-responsible-and-pastoral-engagement-with-artificial-intelligence/news/hongkong/
6. 6. Calling AI 'a gift from God,' Catholic bishops draft usage guidelines for Asia, accessed December 14, 2025, https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2025/12/12/asia-pacific/ai-gift-asia-catholic-bishops/
7. 7. Vatican official urges ethical vigilance as AI reshapes communication, culture, and relationships - LiCAS.news | Light for the Voiceless, accessed December 14, 2025, https://www.licas.news/2025/12/11/vatican-official-urges-ethical-vigilance-as-ai-reshapes-communication-culture-and-relationships/
8. 8. At Hong Kong Bishops' Meet, Vatican Official Warns of AI's Human Risks | RVA, accessed December 14, 2025, https://www.rvasia.org/asian-news/hong-kong-bishops-meet-vatican-official-warns-ais-human-risks
9. 9. FABC-OSC Bishops' Meet Concludes in Hong Kong with Call for Responsible and Pastoral Engagement with Artificial Intelligence - Radio Veritas Asia, accessed December 14, 2025, https://www.rvasia.org/asian-news/fabc-osc-bishops-meet-concludes-hong-kong-call-responsible-and-pastoral-engagement
10. 10. Act to safeguard humanity from AI risks, Vatican official says at meeting in Hong Kong | Asia, accessed December 14, 2025, https://www.examiner.org.hk/2025/12/11/act-to-safeguard-humanity-from-ai-risks-to-vatican-official-says-at-meeting-in-hong-kong/news/hongkong/
11. 11. New Vatican document examines potential and risks of AI - Catholic ..., accessed December 14, 2025, https://www.cbcew.org.uk/new-vatican-document-examines-potential-and-risks-of-ai/
12. 12. Pope Leo Takes On AI -- OpEd - Eurasia Review, accessed December 14, 2025, https://www.eurasiareview.com/29072025-pope-leo-takes-on-ai-oped/
13. 13. Lessons from the Vatican's AI Guidelines - Word on Fire, accessed December 14, 2025, https://www.wordonfire.org/articles/lessons-from-the-vaticans-ai-guidelines/
14. 14. Human Dignity and the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence: A Framework for Responsible Design and Use from the Perspective of Catholic Social Teaching, accessed December 14, 2025, https://www.wpunj.edu/cosh/macs-scholars-program/assets/Ethics.pdf
15. 15. The call - Rome Call for AI Ethics, accessed December 14, 2025, https://www.romecall.org/the-call/
16. 16. Rome Call for AI Ethic, accessed December 14, 2025, https://www.romecall.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/RomeCall_Paper_web.pdf
17. 17. Responding to Pope Leo's call in the digital age: Asian Church ..., accessed December 14, 2025, https://www.licas.news/2025/12/11/responding-to-pope-leos-call-in-the-digital-age-asian-church-reflects-on-ai-and-digital-ministry/
18. 18. Bishops to Congress: AI must support dignity of person, common good, accessed December 14, 2025, https://www.catholicworldreport.com/2025/06/09/bishops-to-congress-ai-must-support-dignity-of-person-common-good/
19. 19. Hong Kong: Asian Church leaders gather to discern AI's pastoral impact - Hallam Diocese, accessed December 14, 2025, https://hallam-diocese.com/hong-kong-asian-church-leaders-gather-to-discern-ais-pastoral-impact/